Page 1 of 2

Another Random Theory

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:16 am
by Saturn
I Just wanted to post a theory i have about the Way. Basicly this theory is based on ideas ive got from multiple places. Firstly Rhue was the cause of the Landorin Massacare and killed everyone including the Kid, who was really Rhue. Then the Present Rhue tried to absorb the kid Rhue's aura but it didnt go according to plan and the memories of the Present Rhue became muddled with those of the kids Rhue. So now the Present Rhue thinks he's Rhue when he really isnt and is searching for Serana, who is most likely dead. Also another theory about the Phantom Slasher is that the Phantom Slasher is the Rhue who caused the Massacare and when Rhue sleeps this side of him takes over. Also the Phantom Slasher may be part of some group which is responsible for stopping people from finding out the Truth of the way, that There is no end of The Way, it simply keeps looping around. Anyway these are just some random theories of mine which I felt like posting

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:12 am
by Impossible
I hope you die a very painful death as soon as possible.

See, how would you guys manage without me? You'd be overrun by idiots without anyone to get rid of many of them.

Another Random Theory

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:29 am
by Squish
Saturn wrote:Anyway these are just some random theories of mine which I felt like posting
(emphasis added)

Impossible wrote:You'd be overrun by idiots without anyone to get rid of many of them.


Chill Impossible, it's only a theory. He can theorise anything he wanted to, that doesn't make him an idiot. It makes him a thinker. To theorise is to think. To make mistakes is to learn. He will learn, and form better theories. Don't burn the new guy. Let him be. Make this a happy place for all people, so that we might actually attract people rather than deter them. Even if you classify them as idiots. There is no such thing as bad publicity.

Impossible wrote:See, how would you guys manage without me?


Don't take it personally, but I think we'd do pretty well.

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:52 am
by Impossible
I don't think the issue is whether or not the post was a theory, or whether or not he's allowed to theorise. Or whether or not Squish is incredibly dense, but while we're on that topic...

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:22 am
by Aegis
Impossible: Jeez, man, cool it! It may be incredibly obvious, but not THAT obvious... it's not a verified fact. Well, mabye it sorta is (not looping thing tho, that really dosn't seem likely), but you don't have to get all "Burn in hell, please! I hope someone painfully assasinates you with a twelve-guage at point blank range!" Although, squish does have to be pretty dense not to figuire out that it's the sheer obviousness of it all pissing you off. Don't get the wrong impression though, i kinda respect you for recognising true lameness when it shows up, you just get way too pissed way too fast.

Squish: His post was about the sheer stupidity in the total obviousness of that theory.

Saturn: Don't take it personally, but that theory is kinda self-evident in the game, so much so that it is a bit retarded to post it. This is why I've never posted my nearly flawless Kloe = Serena theory, it's so obvious no one needs to say it again like it's new. It's like standing in the front lawn of red house and saying, "that house is red", or "we're standing on grass!"

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:50 pm
by Impossible
Squish: His post was about the sheer stupidity in the total obviousness of that theory.


That's not why I said he was dense.

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:01 pm
by Burning_Flame
impostible you need your old avatar back it suited u. looked angry and ready to flame some noob. ur new one is all happy and throughs me off everytime

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:23 pm
by MiDiMaN
What's this I sense? Something incoherent to the topic?

Though the new avatar IS strange though...(especially that purple wierd computer thing that it was...)

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:48 pm
by Squish
Elucidate for me Impossible, what constitutes the label of dense in this case?

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:16 pm
by Jabbo
Saturn, if you came up with those ideas on your own, then that's pretty good; it's probably more than I could come up with the first time I played through it. If you notice, though, they've been mentioned approximately eighty times in various topics on these forums. And try to be a bit more coherent next time you post unless you have something that prevents it (non-english native language, illiteracy, worship of the god of poor grammar, etc).

Squish, I'm all up for not flaming the new guy, but I think his incoherence of speaking at least partially justifies it. If he doesn't want to get flamed, let him fend for himself. And as a side note, no one in their right mind ever uses the word "elucidate." Ever.

Hmm...

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:29 pm
by LunC
Never, never flame a newbie...


Or anyone else for that matter. :wink:

Lun

PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:31 pm
by Eliminator
That's actually a good theory.

Re: Hmm...

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2005 11:30 am
by Kyle
LunC wrote:Never, never flame a newbie...


Or anyone else for that matter. :wink:

Lun


Impossible's been doing that for years and you only know point that out?

:?

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2005 12:48 pm
by loona
I don't know, this forum has some pretty messed up rules anyway. On the one hand it says to not mock people, on the other it says that people should "have tolerance".

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:57 pm
by Telephalsion
have tolerance can be many things, tolerate someone who likes something you don't for an example, or tolerate someone who's stupid, or someone who breaks the rules, whatever