Moderators: Porter, EmperorJeramyu, Telephalsion
fwacho wrote:Two points. The scar that my friend recieved was a hand print, like a burn scar.
evolution takes as much faith as Creationism, if not more particularly when considering the evidence. (carbon dating is worhtless--fresh lava rock have been dated at 100,000 years by labs. for one example. then you have the mix up of spposed setiment layers, various hoaxes--piltdown man ect., then their are the protien tests to switch no-organic right-handed prtoeins in to organic left-handed proteins which has been proved impossible.) Scientists are lying to you to protect their careers / reputations. they are telling you what you want to hear. no surprise becasue that's how they get their funding. It all about money and the masses are suffering.
RentACop wrote:
arbon dating is worthless? You do realize that magma isn't the sort of place where fossils are normally found? Mostly due to how very, very, hot it is? Yes, Piltdown man was a hoax. I can think of one other, and a few fossils that had their signifigance downgraded, which is pretty good especialy when we compared it to other human endeavors like say, the government or religion. Heh, "supposed" sediment layers? Are you implying that they do not exist or that a few anomalies invalidate the entire thing? I have no idea what you're talking about with the proteins, though if you're pointing out how all living creatures seem to have left-handed protiens I agree that that is unspeakably odd, but keep in mind evolution itself doesn't deal with how life arose....or at least it isn't supposed to be.
and as war mention: evolution takes as much faith as Creationism, if not more particularly when considering the evidence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest