The continuing saga of "Wrong Way"! Season Two!

[EmperorJeramyu]

Goddamn it, you're right. The laws of physics! How could I be so daft!? I can't write a giant story if I can't lift a giant pencil. DAMN IT!

[Glenn47]

Not to mention that Jer wrote that in what looks like about 10 minutes worth of thought. He only wrote it because Bill was pushing him, and he didn't really feel like it at the time. You try being perfect under those conditions. It's hard, but Jer pulls it off quite well.

[OverlordBill]

You guys manage to shit up all the good topics. Shut up. You wasted two pages on the importance of grammar. Shut up. You smell like fish. Shut up.

[EmperorJeramyu]

I like to think of it as spiritual progression.

Oh, and I did write the next episode, but I realized it wasn't funny at all. I really need some new juice or something.

[Porter]

Ever think of popping pills?

[Takarious]

Try drinking cough syrup! Dr. Mom will tell you what to write!

[Impossible]

I'd rather choose "responded replied noted said observed" than "said said said said said said.

Which is exactly why you can't read, because I said several times that by no means is "said said said said said said" a good thing to do, but using innappropriate words just for the sake of having different words is bad.

I'm ignoring Takarious and Excell after this post because they're full of shit. The Chronicles of Prydain are great books, and regardless, if I'd read Harry Potter or LotR thinking about writing style I would have learnt just the same thing, it was only an example. And Takarious doesn't even seem to know what the fuck he's arguing about.

I'm also ignoring Jeramyu because while his post was full of misconceptions, assumptions and stupidity, and maybe a couple of decent opinions, I couldn't find much of an argument that had anything to do with what I said.

Actually, I will do one quick thing with what Takarious said:

Why don't you stop critiquing the works of others you pompous prick. Let us see you do better Impossible. Frankly, your fan work is not "publisher" material as you decided to put it. It's decent, that much I'll give you, however do not make it seem as if you are some literature phenom.

I'm telling you to shut the fuck up because you have no place to talk. Did I say you were a self proclaimed published writer? No, I don't see that anywhere jackass, so stop putting words in my fucking mouth. Furthermore, the word publisher was used in the context of your comments on Jera. I called you a pompous prick simply because you bash your betters in order to make you appeal to others. So how am I being a hypocrite? When did I contradict myself? Did I once say you COULD be a published writer? Fuck no I didn't so I don't see where you're getting this from. Frankly, I don't think you even know what that word means, because I swear I see you call people hypocrites on a daily basis. And half the time it has absolutely no relevance to what they say. Perhaps I'll just keep things simple and to the point, so that your egotistical shallow mind can comprehend the words without dubbing me as a "hypocrite", as you so obtusely put it. In the end, what I was trying to say was:

You being a good writer is simply Impossible. Ironic, eh?

So please just do us all the service and keep your damn inferior complex to yourself you petulant faggot.

Bold is clear hypocrisy, italics is when you'd have to be a fucking moron to argue that you didn't directly contradict yourself. Also, the line "You being a good writer is simply Impossible." had NOTHING whatsoever to do with the conversation. As I said before, you didn't seem to know what the fuck I'm talking about (ironically before I took a close look at your posts now and conveniently proved myself right), and as your post went on it became increasingly ridiculous and irrelevant, not to mention hypocritical and full of shit.

[Takarious]

I'm not argueing anything sir, if I was argueing I'd actually be trying to make a point. I'm just verbally assaulting you. If I were argueing I'd present valid points and actually build upon it. Too bad the basis of my statements revolve around "You suck ass at writing so shut the fuck up". Since you've yet to debate the point I've made, it can't really be considered an arguement. We're pretty much just slinging mud at this point. Now go hump kangaroos Ausie boy.

[Impossible]

Too bad the basis of my statements revolve around "You suck ass at writing so shut the fuck up".

Too bad your statements have nothing to do with the actual argument, rendering your bullshit-filled posts worthless.

Now go hump kangaroos Ausie boy.

Now go hump your president American boy.

[Takarious]

SO AUSTRALIA IS LED BY KANGAROOS!

[Teenr0cker]

Damn them and their Authoritarian, Marxist, Communist, Leftist, Monarchy!










Wait....

[EmperorJeramyu]

I'm also ignoring Jeramyu because while his post was full of misconceptions, assumptions and stupidity, and maybe a couple of decent opinions, I couldn't find much of an argument that had anything to do with what I said.

You're being real specific there. I'm under the impression that you can't argue against it so you're using that as a general excuse. You seem to do that a lot.

Please, in one or two sentences, summarize your argument, so that we can go right to the source of this thing. Then I'd also like you to quote one misconception, one assumption, and one example of stupidity, so that I can see what exactly you're refering to.

[Porter]

I never saw an arguement presented. Just a little prick that never shuts his trap.

[Takarious]

How the fuck have I contradicted myself? Does me calling you pompous give you the impression that I was saying you were good? No, of course not, I was simply saying you think you're good. So me saying afterwards that your work is not "publisher" material does not contradict shit because there's really nothing to argue from the first sentence. So please, give me insight as to how I'm actually contradicting my own personal opinions, seeing as you obviously know them better than I. Are you fucking retarded, nothing you pointed out remotely contradicts anything I said, you just have the same sense of logic as a nine year old. Hell, right about now I'm willing to bet you are somewhere around that age. Any point you've tried to present against me is simply your own exaggerated heresay, which makes it a pain in the ass to argue against, seeing as all you do is incoherrently translates a personal attack on yourself as some sort of recursive contradiction. You tell me that I was argueing earlier? No, me giving my opinion that you suck and shouldn't judge the works of others was a SUGGESTION. Therefore me following up on a conversation involving other people is pretty much an empty use of my time. You're the one that decided to turn it into an arguement by calling my a hypocrite with pretty much no basis, and act like a fool trying to prove something that isn't there. I've yet to see an explaination as to "how" those statements contradicted each other. My point is that you pretty much argue on absolutely no grounds to do so, and you fabricate your own personal delusion as a folly attempt at making others slip up. Personally, I think it's a pain in the ass argueing with some kid with absolutely no logical prowess. Oh well, let's just wait until you find more useless crap to fill up your lack of ability in terms of debate.

[Fitz Tayo]

Right. Stop arguing here, for one thing, it pisses lots of people off, and if this topic gets locked, more people'll get pissed. So shut the hell up and argue some where else less significant to the forum.