OverlordBill wrote:Whatshisname with the mechanical legs was completely forgotten after they actually got the gun. Hell, you can tell that scene was chopped to shreds. It makes no sense.
Dude, it's the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It's
supposed to be riddled with plotholes and nonsensical plotlines. Actually, part of it also feels like they really needed to make the Restaurant at the End of the Universe, too. I mean, nobody got pissed at HP or LotR for not explaining everything at the end of each movie, because they're in a series. This SHOULD be the same.
Speaking of those movies, it's kind of odd that I wasn't all that upset about either. I hated FotR, but I just though "oh well, the books are better, it doesn't matter". HP and the Philosopher's (Sorceror's being the fake American name) Stone was a similar case, too. But I
can't let go of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It only got one chance and I'm disappointed about the potential that was at least partly left behind. It's also not as famous as the other two and it deserves a chance to be known.
Doesn't it seem odd to anybody that they included the part about the whale and petunias, but not the lines which would have made the scene in front of Arthur's house good instead of sucky? Geez, what was more important? Not to mention how much more effort that would have taken, in comparison to how easy it would have been to leave in those lines.
I think if you try to view it as a normal movie, you'll like it less, but if you try to view it as a movie version of the book, you'll hate it, too, because it isn't really. So in that sense the movie makers fucked up by making everyone hate it. There were parts I very much liked, and things I was angry with, but we have to face the fact that not EVERY word from the Guide and random addition of some crazy funny thing could have been included.