the_don wrote:hi all
i am new at this forem thing i found out about it from my friend "springfield"
THE Don
i am yuor modrater, i got teh job from my frein d lun. i also dnot leik your friend "springfield"
-PORte r
Moderators: Porter, EmperorJeramyu, Telephalsion
the_don wrote:hi all
i am new at this forem thing i found out about it from my friend "springfield"
THE Don
Ok why do they admit to being part of doovy and co? wjy cant they just not admit it? Are they that stupid?

Impossible wrote:Ok why do they admit to being part of doovy and co? wjy cant they just not admit it? Are they that stupid?
1. Even if they didn't, we'd work it out.
2. Yes, they are that stupid.
Forerunner, your post is really biased. Don't give yourself so much credit, you made a total moron of yourself a few times on the Gaming forum.
Porter is the unquestioned winner of the topic, though.
Black-Cat wrote:Only the ones with egos made of steel can withstand the scourge of emotional deterioration often referred to as "having no life".
And saying Xbox rulz and Zelda sucks isnt being a moron, it's just expressing my opinion... and I've taken back the latter anyway...

Sage Of The Wise wrote:This sounds like the beginning of a sitcom. Think about it: "Coming this fall to Fox, Ralphie and the Hooker".
Douglas Adams wrote:If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.
thank you those people you have proven yourself pure idiots

Impossible wrote:thank you those people you have proven yourself pure idiots
omg, i feel so dum now![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
now evry1 here wil h8 me and ill hav no frends nemore ive proven myslef 2 b pure idiots & so has evry1 else so were all losers & u win
Teenr0cker wrote:He didn't have evidence to back his statement up, so it's either a theory, which is technically biased because all humans are biased to a degree, or it could be his biased opinion. In order to express fact, he would need to analyze every aspect of the subjects and then make a conclusion about which ones do or don't rule, using complete unbiased judgement. Then he would be incredibly, undoubtedly right or wrong, depending on his choice and the results.
The fact of the matter is, you cannot say one system is better than the other and be so correct that if an omnipotent and omniscient force existed and logged the whole justification, it would agree, totally unbiased. The only way to say which is better would probably be found in either units sold or profit made, again, depending on preference. The entire market is based off of preference, so that may very well be the best and only way to determine what the majority of the consumer world considers the best. Until somebody pulls those numbers up, convincing another person to change their mind would require resorting to immature and irrational behavior, usually spamming or flaming*, in hopes of forcing the target to submit and "Convert".
*God forbid they Ignore you in IRC, lest you avoid eachother using technology instead of rational self-control.
Black-Cat wrote:Only the ones with egos made of steel can withstand the scourge of emotional deterioration often referred to as "having no life".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest