Verb's right... with the server down, it doesn't matter how many mirrors we have: no one could get to them; and sadly, no one could access the MB to see just how right I was..... heh.
Bill, the more "seeders" (people who have the file and are just sharing it) and "leechers" (people who are trying to get the file), sometimes the better the performance since everyone who downloads has to upload the file simultaneously. BitTorrents work the best when there's a lot of folks seeding and leeching. I don't know what torrents you're used to hosting, but these files are nothing compared to any movie file.... (I've been seeding E1-4 right now for 3 days, and it uses 39 MB of RAM). I don't know where you got your "3 servers seeding the file" info..... it's just plain wrong, but whilst I was reading your post in utter confusion, I couldn't help but feel joyful due to the glory of your avatar icon.
An early bittorrent release just makes sense (earlier than the direct download). It'll take the tremendous load of distribution to the people who want the file. I'm not sayin it'll happen.... just that if it did, it would work and solve any bandwidth dilema.
After a thread full of topics ranging from
1) The successful test of BitTorrents to ... er...
2) Critisicm that torrents will never work, to the
3) Monumental 25th post of the verb, culminating in
4) holstein cow's 100% FREE UNDERAGE WITH GUNS BONDAGE RAPE comment,
I declare this to be a fully ripe thread.... perfect for the locking