Strayed Wanderer wrote:What you're talking about can hardly be considered a form of anarchy, it is closer to true communism. Anarchy, regardless of definition, has implied chaos and disorder since the term was coined. The only difference I see between your version and true communism is that originally it was "Everything belongs to everyone" but for you it is "My stuff is mine, but you can share it". Failing to refer to your beliefs as communism makes it seem as if you are unwilling to acknownledge the previous failures of large scale true communism.
Communism's original goal was Anarchy. Anarchy is the lack of government, where communism is the ultimate of big government, meant to remove greed, or breed out selfishness. Communism is exactly what I'd like to avoid.
Outside of North America, Anarchy is often known as Libertarian Communism, which sounds like an oxymoron to most americans, but outside of the country, Libertarianism is anarchy, not buisness without government, like it is here.
Anarchy is not absence of order. The circle around the A represents order. Natural order, where no-one is kept down.
For me, the message isn't "This stuff is mine, but you can share it." My message is "This stuff is mine, and I will share it."
I want the best for humanity, so why should I cripple myself by saying "It isn't possible?", and then sit around, living with a system that's more damaging then helpful? It's just not going to happen.
That kind of idealism only works in movies, novels and video games, and usually someone shows up to fuck with it anyway.
At least I'm trying for a better system.